RASA & WILLIAM BOND
I AM ON THE SAME PAGE AS YOU WILLIAM.
ARE YOU AWARE OF WHAT CHOMSKY & PARENTI ARE TEACHING? I EXPLAIN IT IN SOME
OF MY VIDEOS.
CHOMSKY TEACHES WE HAVE ONLY ONE PARTY IN THE U.S., THE BUSINESS PARTY. BOTH
DEMOCRATS & REPUBLICANS BELONG TO THE BUSINESS PARTY - NO OTHER PARTY HAS A
CHANCE OF WINNING, AS THE MULTI MILLIONS NEEDED TO RUN A CAMPAIGN ARE
PROVIDED BY THESE CORPORATIONS, WHICH THEN RULE THRU THE PRESIDENT, THE
PRESIDENT IS A PUPPET.
HOWEVER, CHOMSKY SAYS THERE IS A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRESIDENTS THAT
COULD SAVE MANY THOUSANDS, EVEN HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS, FROM MISERY.
ARE YOU ASSUMING THAT I AM GOING TO PUT ON THE MANTLE OF THE LEFTIST WITHOUT
TAKING THEIR INFORMATION & TYING IT TO MATRIARCHY? INDEED NOT, I AM GOING
TO CHALLENGE THEM THAT THEY ARE WAITING FOR THE GOOD GUY TO TAKE OVER, I
SAID EMPHATICALLY 'THERE AIN'T NO GOOD GUY - IT WILL BE THE WOMAN, WOMEN WHO
TAKE OVER & RULE WHO WILL CREATE ORDER.'
FEMINISTS? I THINK THEY SOME OF THEM ARE A BIT EMBARRASSED BY BEING OLD HAT
BY NOW, THEY HAVE A PLATFORM THAT IS SO OLD & SO RIGID, THEY HAVE NOT GONE
THE NEXT STEP, & IT IS MYSELF & A FEW PEOPLE LIKE YOU (NOT MANY! CAN'T EVEN
THINK WHO ELSE) WHO HAVE TAKEN THE NEXT STEP.
THEY HAVE THE DESCRIPTION OF WOMAN THOU ART GOD, RIGHT ON THE FRONT PAGE OF
THE MS MAGAZINE OF THE INTERNET, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THIS IS THE NEXT STEP.
SO DO HAVE TO CUT LOOSE FROM SOME OF THEIR OLD FASHIONED EQUALITY ISSUES &
ACCEPT WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TEACHING, PERHAPS THE GENERATION AFTER GLORIA
STEINEM, WHO IS NOW MAYBE 74 YEARS OLD.
WHY CAN'T I GET YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM DOING - DO YOU? I AM SEEING
THESE DISSIDENTS (REALLY YOU MUST TAKE A LOOK AT THEIR YOUTUBES, I DON'T
THINK YOU KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SAYING) & I AM SAYING THAT WHAT THEY ARE
LOOKING AT ARE THE DETAILS OF PATRIARCHY, IN OTHER WORDS, IF WE LIVED IN THE
TIME OF JULIUS CAESAR, SIMPLY EXPLAINING THE DETAILS OF WHAT HE IS DOING, &
WHAT OTHER IMPERIALISTS & TYRANTS ARE DOING, WHO WORK BY A WAR MENTALITY.
I AM TAKING THEM AS PROOF OF WHAT PATRIARCHY IS DOING, THEY HAVE THE PROOF,
THEY HAVE THE EXPERTISE, & I AM SAYING LOOK, THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
IT IS SAME OLE SAME OLE HISTORY...NOW, SHALL WE OPEN A NEW PAGE?
THE NEW PAGE IS COMING ANYWAY...THIS PATRIARCHY IS DYING BECAUSE MEN ARE
DYING. LET US REJOICE AT THEIR DEMISE & GET READY FOR MATRIARCHY.
MEN OF COURSE WILL STILL BE AROUND FOR ABOUT 100,000 YEARS - (ALSO WE DON'T
KNOW IF GLOBAL WARMING & THE EARTH TILTING OFF ITS AXIS WILL DESTROY MOST OF
HUMANITY) & SO MEN WILL BE HERE, BUT THEIR POWER IS DECLINING VERY FAST, AS
WE SPEAK. THEY LOOK STRONG BUT THEY ARE BREAKING DOWN FROM WITHIN, EVERY
DAY MORE & MORE. MATRIARCHY IS INEVITABLE, I BELIEVE THAT ALMIGHTY MOTHER
GOD IS TAKING THEM OUT.
SO NEITHER LEFT NOR RIGHT MALE DOMINATION WILL PREVAIL, IT WILL BE A WORLD
There is one other point. Although the left wing and
feminism can see clearly the problems with patriarchy,
they do not have the solution in solving it.
Before the French revolution there were many great
writers, writing about the how patriarchal governments
oppress the people. Unfortunately, when these
intellectuals took power they behaved as badly, if not
worse, than the government they replaced. This has
been true of all left wing revolutions. Like the
Russian and Chinese revolutions. Robert Mugabe the
President of Zimbabwe is also a extreme Left winger,
yet his government is not about caring for the people.
As he is continuing to destroy his country.
Feminists are off course the same, they tell you all
about the problems of patriarchy, but they then tamely
say. "The solution is sexual equality" without
discussing how this is possible. After all, if men are
so bad in positions of power, what makes them think
they will be any better in government that enforces
sexually equality? They would obviously continue to
fight and compete against the women and each other for
Unfortunately both the left wing and feminism will not
look at the obvious solution, which is Matriarchy.
They seen very clearly what the problem are, but are
very hazy about the possible solution.
You talk about Truman, but he was a Democrat which
suppose to be a left-wing party. It was also Kennedy
and Johnson, again both Democrats, that took USA into
the Vietnam war. (The irony was, that it was a right-
wing Republican, Nixon, that took USA out of this war,
and made peace.)
It makes sense that a right-winger like Bush invaded
Iraq, but his strongest supporter was Blair, who was
the leader of a left-wing party.
So it means that even if we had a world wide
revolution and all governments were taken over by
left-wing political parties, would we be any better
off than now?
Yes, use Noam Chomsky, David Barsamian, Michael
Parenti and Naomi Wolf to point out the problems with
patriarchy but then go on to explain what would be the
only solution, which is Matriarchy. In the end while
competitive and aggressive men rule our world, it
doesn't matter if they have good intentions and want
to make our world a better place. The end result would
be the same.
Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung and Po-Pot all had ideals
about making the world a better place. Unfortunately
they used very aggressive masculine methods to do
this. Believing that, "the ends justify the means". So
war, mass murder, and torture were acceptable means to
achieve their ideals of a better world.
The fact, is that that you cannot create a loving and
caring world by teaching people to hate and fight each
other. You have to use feminine methods to achieve
this. Which are the methods of communication,
understanding and love. A Matriarchal government has
to be dominated by genuine loving and caring Women to
create a loving and caring society. Women cannot rule,
or take over the world, by force and violence, they
can only do this by showing the people, (men and
Women), they would be far better off in a world ruled