I HAVE INCREDIBLE ARTICLES ABOUT MARY BEING WORSHIPPED AS GOD OR GODDESS AS
ESPOUSED BY TWO CLOSE FRIENDS, WHICH HAVE ALREADY BEEN FEATURED IN MY TWO
MATRIARCHAL BOOKS. ONE IS 'WHEN MARY WAS WORSHIPPED AS GOD' BY MARCUS
MOESSNER WHICH I REWROTE AS ENGLISH IS HIS SECOND LANGUAGE, AND ALSO 'THE
SECRET LIFE OF THE VIRGIN MARY' BY WILLIAM BOND, IN MY LATEST BOOK, WHICH I
WILL ENTER HERE SOON - BOTH OF THEM.
I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO POST MY THINKING ON HOW TO WORSHIP MARY OR MOTHER, THE
FEMININE DIVINE, AS GOD. I HAVE MADE A NUMBER OF SUCH DEVOTIONAL
PROPOSITIONS, AND THEY ARE IN MY BOOKS, MY SITE, AND GROUPS, JUST GIVE ME
SOME TIME TO GET THESE AND POST, AS RIGHT NOW I AM PUTTING TOGETHER ANOTHER
KIND OF BOOK AND AM FOCUSED UP TO MY EYEBALLS ON IT.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR EXPLAINING YOUR POSITION, AND THIS GIVES ME ALL THE
LEEWAY I NEED.
AS FAR AS FLAME WARS, MANY PEOPLE FIND SOMETHING ABOUT ME THAT LURES THEM TO
ANGER, ENVY, OUTRAGE AND JUST PLAIN HATE. THERE IS THE VIEW OF FEMALE
SUPREMACY AND MATRIARCHY SOME MEN HATE, THERE IS MY FORMER PARTICIPATION IN
THE ADULT TRADE THAT BOTH MEN AND WOMEN SNEER AT AND FEEL IT GIVES THEM
PERMISSION TO CALL ME NAMES....IT IS THIS PARTICULAR CONNECTION, THE SEX
TRADE IDEA, THAT I THINK GOD ESPECIALLY WANTS ME TO EXPLAIN. IN THE OLD
DAYS OF MATRIARCHY AND FEMININE WORSHIP, SEX WAS NOT A SIN NOR CONSIDERED
DIRTY, BUT IN THE DELUSION OF PATRIARCHY, IT IS, NOT WITHOUT SURPRIZE, BAD
FOR WOMEN, BUT THE SAME ACTION TURNS MEN INTO STUDS AND VIRILE HEROES. DOES
ANYONE SEE THE LINK HERE CALLED SUPPRESSION, REPRESSION, PROJECTION AND
MISOGYNY? IF YOU DO, PLEASE STATE YOUR VIEWPOINT.
THANK YOU BRYANT AND UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN HERE, WITH MARY, THE FEMININE GOD
OVER US, INFINITE LOVE AND LIGHT TO YOU ALL.
From: E Bryant Holman
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Mary_Queen_of_Heaven] totally twisted?
We are not having any flame wars here. All viewpoints are welcome, but
people should remember that this was not founded as a catholic group,
and Tyler (the founder) I think wanted to see more non-catholic than
catholic messages, however that never happened. His decision to allow
catholic discussions here was based on his realizing that this was the
practical thing to do. However, the situation has not changed wherein
anyone can claim to speak for the authorized point of view here,
because as far as we are concerned, there is none. If anyone can write
more intriguing prose than yours, we would surely welcome that. But as
far as I can see, as far as original stuff, you pretty much are the
cock of the walk here.
I am sorry I didn't continue with my pontification the last time I
wrote. I have lost my train of thought now. But I welcome your input
here. Keep it coming.
Tyler believes that Mary if the Queen of Heaven, but he also believes
in the Chinese/Hindu/Tibetan goddess Tara, and probably in some other
goddess figures. In short, he seems to subscribe to the neopagan
viewpoint that Mary is just a manifestation of the Earth Goddess, or
something similar to that. These sorts of beliefs are quite common, and
this group was founded to appeal to people who have beliefs of that
sort, albeit, as I pointed out, the purpose of the group was modified
to allow catholics to participate freely, but with the understanding
that they would not be rude to people who choose to see Mary as a
The term "Queen of Heaven" - I think this is pretty much universally
recognized by historians - was the title of the Asian mother goddess
Astarte, whose roots go back at least as far as the Sumerian goddess
Inanna. The title was adopted by the Romans in order to incorporate the
assets of the Astarte temple cult into the organization of the newly
founded official religion of their empire, the Catholic Church.
On Tue Jan 23 19:45 ,
>Wow, Souls must be with me as it seems the next flame war has been
>thank you Souls and Mary Queen of Heaven.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: E Bryant
> To: Mary_Queen_of_Heaven
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23,
> 2007 7:27 PM
> Subject: Re:
> [Mary_Queen_of_Heaven] totally twisted?
> You are simply ahead of your time, Rasa. You should have your
> own tv show, i
>think. Your arguments are pretty convincing - or pretty
> interesting anyway -
>attractive? yes they are that too. This is beautiful
>I want to write more but I am listening to Ask Dr Maddo - I
> will get back to you
>later. keep up the could work!